<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Spring Singleton is not a Singleton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/</link>
	<description>Jing Xue's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Parag Soman</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-106537</link>
		<dc:creator>Parag Soman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-106537</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this article and removing my confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this article and removing my confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raish</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-80424</link>
		<dc:creator>Raish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-80424</guid>
		<description>Good explanation, thnk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good explanation, thnk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwu</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-46745</link>
		<dc:creator>pwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-46745</guid>
		<description>very well explained! thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very well explained! thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freizl</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-14279</link>
		<dc:creator>freizl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/09/14/a-spring-singleton-is-not-a-singleton/#comment-14279</guid>
		<description>good article about this confusion!
and there is a section in the  RD J Chapter 4,'Avoid a Proliferation of Singletons by Using an Application Registry', seem to also talk about this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article about this confusion!<br />
and there is a section in the  RD J Chapter 4,&#8217;Avoid a Proliferation of Singletons by Using an Application Registry&#8217;, seem to also talk about this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
