Comments on: A Spring Singleton is not a Singleton

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:35:12 +0000

good~ thanks!

By: Amal

Amal — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:26:43 +0000

Very well explained. Always wondered about the fine differences between the two. Thanks for the explanation!

By: JEx

JEx — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:03:11 +0000

Perfectly nice One!!!

By: Thamayanthi

Thamayanthi — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:22:43 +0000

Nice Explanation!!!

By: shan

shan — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:27:39 +0000

I it very nice explanation. So you are gonna say Spring developers have to take a special consideration in this regard.

By: jaa

jaa — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:49:32 +0000

In this context, it’s also useful to note that by default Spring beans are singleton – i.e even if you don’t specify singleton=”true” or scope=”singleton”, it’s created as a Spring-Singleton. So, there are certain cases where we need to explicitly say scope=”prototype” to avoid multithreaded issues.

By: Pawan

Pawan — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:44:00 +0000

Very Nicely Explained !

By: Parag Soman

Parag Soman — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:57:05 +0000

Thanks a lot for this article and removing my confusion.

By: Raish

Raish — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:59:37 +0000

Good explanation, thnk!

By: pwu

pwu — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:42:13 +0000

very well explained! thanx

By: freizl

freizl — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:03:15 +0000

good article about this confusion!
and there is a section in the RD J Chapter 4,’Avoid a Proliferation of Singletons by Using an Application Registry’, seem to also talk about this issue.