<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call Me Pedantic - What Exactly IS Scalability?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/</link>
	<description>Jing Xue's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Purdy</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/comment-page-1/#comment-12515</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Purdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=75#comment-12515</guid>
		<description>&#62; So scalability is about performance - the capability to handle large volume of traffic, as far as web applications go.

There are no "totally agreed upon" definitions, but I use these:

Performance (a.k.a. speed) is about response time.

Scalability is about being able to handle larger volumes of traffic without degrading performance.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; So scalability is about performance - the capability to handle large volume of traffic, as far as web applications go.</p>
<p>There are no &#8220;totally agreed upon&#8221; definitions, but I use these:</p>
<p>Performance (a.k.a. speed) is about response time.</p>
<p>Scalability is about being able to handle larger volumes of traffic without degrading performance.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sampa : colin&#8217;s blog &#187; Spring is Most Certainly Designed for Scalability</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>sampa : colin&#8217;s blog &#187; Spring is Most Certainly Designed for Scalability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=75#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] Some more comments on this in Call Me Pedantic - What Exactly IS Scalability? and What Is Clustering About â€“ An answer to Spring is not d esigned for scalability. &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some more comments on this in Call Me Pedantic - What Exactly IS Scalability? and What Is Clustering About â€“ An answer to Spring is not d esigned for scalability. &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jing Xue</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing Xue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=75#comment-186</guid>
		<description>LOL, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Herron</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/01/16/what-exactly-is-scalability/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>David Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=75#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Call me pedantic, but I think your title on this post is mispeled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me pedantic, but I think your title on this post is mispeled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
