<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Portal Servers &#8211; Jetspeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2005/07/06/open-source-portal-servers-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2005/07/06/open-source-portal-servers-3/</link>
	<description>Jing Xue's Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jing Xue</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2005/07/06/open-source-portal-servers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing Xue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=59#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I went with both liferay and jetspeed 2, with liferay being the primary platform, because it&#039;s got lots of features working out of box. I still cross test my portlets on jetspeed 2 though, just to be more confident on the jsr168 compliance front.

I guess which one to choose really depends on what you are looking for. If you want a portal server working right away, definitely liferay. On the other hand, if you need to develop lots of jsr168 portlets, jetspeed 2 is better in terms of being a jsr168 container.

HTH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with both liferay and jetspeed 2, with liferay being the primary platform, because it&#8217;s got lots of features working out of box. I still cross test my portlets on jetspeed 2 though, just to be more confident on the jsr168 compliance front.</p>
<p>I guess which one to choose really depends on what you are looking for. If you want a portal server working right away, definitely liferay. On the other hand, if you need to develop lots of jsr168 portlets, jetspeed 2 is better in terms of being a jsr168 container.</p>
<p>HTH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egu</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2005/07/06/open-source-portal-servers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Egu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=59#comment-52</guid>
		<description>So have you made a pick out of the portal servers that you evaluated? If so, which one did you pick and why?

Looking forward to your response.

best regards,
Egu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So have you made a pick out of the portal servers that you evaluated? If so, which one did you pick and why?</p>
<p>Looking forward to your response.</p>
<p>best regards,<br />
Egu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piyush Hari</title>
		<link>http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2005/07/06/open-source-portal-servers-3/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Piyush Hari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/?p=59#comment-19</guid>
		<description>The error above might be because the portlet isnot being registered in the HSQL db that comes with it. i was facing the same problem. check your Web.xml and make sure you have the display app name tag and no other tags there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The error above might be because the portlet isnot being registered in the HSQL db that comes with it. i was facing the same problem. check your Web.xml and make sure you have the display app name tag and no other tags there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
